Friday, 9 March 2012

Online jobs index rises in February


NEW YORK (Reuters) - A monthly gauge of online labor demand in the United States rose in February, boosted by solid growth in transportation and warehousing as well as the retail sector, the operator of a job search website said on Friday.

Monster Worldwide Inc, an online careers and recruiting firm, said its employment index rose to 143 last month from 133 in January. The index was up 11 percent from a year earlier.

The index saw annual growth in 19 of the 20 industries and 22 of the 23 occupations monitored last month. Public administration was the only industry to register a decline.

The report was another look at the jobs market ahead of the government's non-farm payrolls report later on Friday. That report is expected to show a third month of solid gains in February, with employers expected to have added 210,000 jobs.

The Monster Employment index is a monthly analysis based on a selection of corporate career sites and job boards. The margin of error is approximately plus or minus 1 percent.
(Reported by Leah Schnurr; Editing by Richard Borsuk)

Source : http://in.news.yahoo.com

ACLU Sues School For Punishing 12-Year-Old Over Facebook Comment


Can a school district punish a student for making derogatory comments about staff members online? Not according to the American Civil Liberties Union, which filed a lawsuit Tuesday against a Minnesota school district and sheriff’s office.

In the suit, filed in U.S. District Court, the ACLU claims a 12-year-old student was disciplined by administrators of the Minnewaska Area School District after she posted on Facebook that she “hated” a hall monitor who was “mean” to her.

In an interesting twist, Facebook’s sign-up policy requires users to reach 13 years of age before they are granted an account. We reached out to Facebook for a comment on the matter, and we’ll update this post when we hear back.

According to the lawsuit, the girl’s principal decided that the Facebook post constituted “bullying.” As punishment, she was given detention and made to apologize.

She then posted another comment, saying that she was annoyed someone had shown her first comment to school officials. This second comment contained off-color language. The school district’s response?

“She was given an in-school suspension and was prohibited from attending a school field trip,” according to the ACLU.

The young girl’s struggle with her school district didn’t end there. The ACLU’s lawsuit says that the girl was later forced by a school administrator to hand over her Facebook and email login information after she was accused of chatting online with another young student about sex. The ALCU said that a local police deputy was present while administrators searched through her online chat record, and that the student’s parents were not informed of the search before it occurred.

None of the posts or emails the school district found offensive were posted from a school computer or on school property.

The ACLU claims the punishments were a violation of the student’s First Amendment right to freedom of speech and Fouth Amendment right to freedom from unreasonable search and seizure.

“Students do not shed their First Amendment rights at the school house gate,” said Charles Samuelson, executive director for the Minnesota branch of the ACLU, in a statement. “The Supreme Court ruled on that in the 1970s, yet schools like Minnewaska seem to have no regard for the standard.”


Do you think the school district was right to punish the student for her posts or ask her for her login information? Sound off in the comments below.

Sunday, 15 January 2012

Internet Overuse Could Cause Structural Brain Damage [STUDY]


Unlike drugs and alcohol, excess Internet usage could help your career, make you more informed and keep you up-to-date with the latest hilarious memes. But a recent (small) study by researchers in China showed that too much Internet usage — to the point that it’s an addiction — can cause structural damage to your brain.

The researchers studied 17 adolescents with Internet Addiction Disorder (IAD) and found structural and functional interference in the part of the brain that regulates organization, possibly causing cognitive impairment similar to that caused by gambling and alcoholism.

Here’s the science behind it: White matter is composed of nerve cells, while the gray matter that we hear so much about is made up of cell bodies. Myelin is a type of fat in the white part (nerve-heavy area) of the brain. This fat insulates the white matter in the brain and makes the transmission speed between nerve signals fast.

The researchers took MRI scans of the subjects and used a method called fractional anisotropy (FA), which measures organization in the brain by locating the presence of white matter. The teens in the study who had been diagnosed with Internet addition showed lower FA than the typical teens. However, the study only tested 17 young people with IAD and compared them against 16 healthy control subjects.

“Overall, our findings indicate that Internet addiction disorder has abnormal white matter integrity in brain regions involved in emotional generation and processing, executive attention, decision making and cognitive control,” write the authors. “The results also suggest that IAD may share psychological and neural mechanisms with other types of substance addiction and impulse control disorders.”

Internet addiction is not officially recognized as a disorder because it has yet to be classified in the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), an encyclopedia of mental and cognitive-related conditions that’s a virtual bible for psychologists. But the American Journal of Psychiatry says IAD is common and should be included in the DSM-V, due out May 2013.

People struggling with addiction often exhibit the same types of compulsive and impulsive behaviors. Something becomes an addiction when it interferes with daily activities and the person’s ability to enjoy life without that thing — whether drugs, gambling, Internet or some other vice.

Some people might joke they’re addicted to their smartphone or computer, but there’s a difference between a constructive and enjoyable habit, and a real addiction.

Are you addicted to the Internet? Take the poll below and read these symptoms from the American Journal of Psychiatry’s article about Internet addiction:

“All of the variants share the following four components: 1) excessive use, often associated with a loss of sense of time or a neglect of basic drives; 2) withdrawal, including feelings of anger, tension and/or depression when the computer is inaccessible; 3) tolerance, including the need for better computer equipment, more software or more hours of use, and 4) negative repercussions, including arguments, lying, poor achievement, social isolation and fatigue.”

Source : Mashable.com

Most Parents Monitor Kids on Facebook — And Have Their Passwords


If you think parents are keeping tabs on their kids’ Facebook profile pages and pictures, you’re absolutely right.

According to a new infographic released by market research firm Lab42, parents are keeping a watchful eye on their child via Facebook, with many checking out their pages daily (43%).

The study — which was conducted among 500 social media users – found that 92% of parents are Facebook friends with their children (of all ages) and more are turning to the site to monitor their kids’ interactions. Safety was named as the top reason for looking at their profiles (40%), followed by curiosity (15%).

But 55% of parents are also making sure the site isn’t it interfering with homework, chores or other activities. Other top concerns include not spending enough time with friends and family (45%), the potential of meeting strangers (41%), bullying others (17%) and being a victim of bullying (16%).

Meanwhile, a high majority – 72% — even have their kids’ Facebook passwords. (Lab42 didn’t provide details on which age demographics for their kids fall into this category.)

However, kids are also checking out their parent’s Facebook pages too. In fact, they are almost equally writing on their parent’s wall (54%) and commenting on photos (51%) as their parents. But even still, it’s mostly the parents initiating the friend requests, with 55% sending it rather than receiving.

Although most children make fun of their parents for their lack of Facebook knowledge (76%), most parents consider themselves very proficient (67%).

For more stats on parent-child interactions on Facebook, check out the infographic below.



Source : Mashable.com

Intel’s Social Cockpit: A Command Center for CES Buzz


LAS VEGAS — CES 2012 is likely to be remembered as the most social trade show yet. The products themselves have had a huge focus on connectedness while social chatter around the event has increased significantly since last year.

For Intel, a social conversation tracker was a natural fit for the company’s booth this year. Dubbed “the Social Cockpit,” Intel’s tool is an Adobe-Air based desktop application that collects CES buzz on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, blogs and forums.

Don’t let the name fool you: There’s no control yoke or headsets. Rather the analytics tool is projected on screens in a small private room above Intel’s main booth area, serving as its team’s social command center.

The Social Cockpit tracks not just hashtags, but specific topics, products and brands being discussed online. The data is updated each hour to give a sense of who’s on top throughout the day as well as a daily report to sum up social conversation, said Aaron Strout of WCG, a communications agency that helped with the project.

While much of the data on Intel’s dashboard suggests widespread interest in ultrabooks, it also showed that Microsoft, Sony and Samsung were on top throughout the week. Mentions of mobile, specifically Android, were significant as well, Strout said.

The Social Cockpit may not be much different from monitoring tools like Radian6 or Chartbeat, but its presence at CES shows tech giants like Intel are committed to social media. These traditionally gadget-focused companies are aiming to gain a deeper understanding of how users engage around not only their brand, but technology in general.

The next step? Allowing products to be driven by this social conversation.

CES 2013: The social media world awaits you.

Source : mashable.com

Thursday, 12 January 2012

फेसबुक, गूगल पर पाबंदी लगा सकते हैं : हाई कोर्ट


नई दिल्ली: दिल्ली उच्च न्यायालय ने गुरुवार को सोशल नेटवर्किंग साइट फेसबुक इंडिया और सर्च इंजन गूगल इंडिया को चेतावनी दी कि अगर वे अपने वेब पेज से आपत्तिजनक सामग्री नहीं हटाते हैं और उनको रोकने का तरीका अपनाने में विफल रहते हैं तो चीन की तरह वेबसाइटों को ‘अवरूद्ध’ किया जा सकता है।

फेसबुक और गूगल इंडिया को चेतावनी देते हुए न्यायमूर्ति सुरेश कैत ने कहा, ‘चीन की तरह हम भी ऐसे सभी वेबसाइटों को अवरूद्ध कर देंगे।’ उन्होंने इन साइटों से ‘हिंसक एवं आपत्तिजनक’ सामग्री को वेब पेज से हटाने और ऐसा करने से रोकने का तरीका विकसित करने को कहा।

मजिस्ट्रेट की अदालत में इन दोनों वेबसाइट के खिलाफ कार्यवाही पर रोक लगाने का न्यायमूर्ति कैत ने समर्थन नहीं किया। बहरहाल वे वकीलों की इस याचिका से सहमत थे कि कल निचली अदालत में वे प्रभावी सुनवाई के लिये दबाव नहीं बनाएंगे।

गूगल इंडिया की ओर से उपस्थित होते हुए पूर्व अतिरिक्त सोलीसीटर जनरल मुकुल रोहतगी ने कहा कि ‘आपत्तिजनक, अश्लील और अपमाजनक’ लेखों एवं अन्य सामग्रियों को लगाने से ‘न तो रोका जा सकता है’ और न ही ‘उनकी निगरानी’ की जा सकती है।

उन्होंने कहा, ‘इसमें मानव हस्तक्षेप संभव नहीं है और ऐसी घटनाओं को रोकना सुसंगत नहीं है। दुनिया में अरबों लोग वेबसाइट पर अपना लेख लगाते हैं। हां, वे अपमानजनक, अश्लील हो सकते हैं लेकिन उन्हें रोका नहीं जा सकता।’

Source : khabar.ndtv.com

Google, Facebook case: Govt to explain current policy by this evening


New Delhi:  Court hearings today did not bring any respite for Google or Facebook, both of who are in legal trouble over obscene material posted on their sites. Yesterday, the Delhi High Court warned that like China, India can shut down these sites. Today, a lower court that had summoned executives from the companies fixed the next hearing for March 13. A crucial development is expected this afternoon, when the government will explain in writing what, in its opinion, can be done to prevent objectionable content from being posted online, and how it currently deals with the issue.

Google and Facebook have appealed against the lower court's proceedings in the Delhi High Court, which will consider the matter on Monday.

Internet companies say they cannot develop a method to monitor defamatory or obscene material that's been posted on their sites. "No human interference is possible, and moreover, it can't be feasible to check such incidents. Billions of people across the globe post their articles on the website."  That met with an angry response from the Delhi High Court yesterday, which said, "You just have a stringent check.  Otherwise, like China, we may pass orders banning all such web sites."

The case centres on a petition filed in December by a man named Vinay Rai, who referred to obscene depictions online of Jesus Christ, the Prophet Mohammed, and various Hindu deities.  In response, a Delhi magistrate summoned the executives of 21 companies and suggested they face trial for criminal conspiracy.

Source : www.ndtv.com